기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

Accelerated examination system in Korea

Flow chart of an accelerated examination
Flow chart of an accelerated examination
According to Article 61 of the Patent Act, the Commissioner of KIPO may have a particular category of patent applications examined ahead of the others. KIPO's regulation concerning the procedure for handling requests for accelerated examination provides that applications eligible for such expedited examination are limited to the following categories:
(1) in case it is considered that an invention has been commercially worked by a person who is not the applicant, after his application has been laid-open;
(2) in case the application is one of the kinds of applications stipulated in the Presidential decree and regarded as urgent
(i) it relates to goods for defense industry and processes for the preparation thereof, as defined in the Special Measures Act Relating to Defense Industry
(ii) it relates to facilities for the prevention of environmental pollution or a process thereof
(iii) it is directly involved in the promotion of export as evidenced by export records, a letter of credit, a request for validating patent rights from the buyer of expected goods, or documents related to the adoption of international standards
(iv) it is made officially by an employee of the central government, a local government(including application filed by exclusive organizations for technology transfer and commercialization, which were established in national and public school)
(v) patent applications that the KIPO Commissioner and the heads of patent offices in other countries agreed to examine on a priority basis
(vi) applications about which anyone requests one of the KIPO-approved agencies(namely the Korea Institute of Patent Information/WIPS Co., Ltd./the Korea IP Protection Technology Institute Co., Ltd./and the IP Solution Co., Ltd.) to conduct the prior art search and asks the agency to forward the search results to the KIPO commissioner
(vii) and so forth
A person who desires an accelerated examination of his application must submit a written request together with a statement explaining the necessity thereof in detail and any evidence supporting the statement
라벨:

댓글

댓글 쓰기

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

A precedent about the inventiveness of the patent

The Supreme Court's Precedent has been published which states that the inventiveness of the patent already registered should not be judged in the trial for confirmation of the scope of right to define an application range of patent right. On March 20 th , 2014, the supreme court decision confirmed the original trial that decided against a demandant with respect to the confirmation suit of patent right scope, in which company “A” specialized in manufacturing a special equipment vehicle (SEV) filed a suit revoking the decision of the Intellectual Property Tribunal (IPT) that determined its designing of feed transportation vehicle is similar with Kim’s registration utility model. With respect to the claim raised by company “A”, in which “Kim’s utility model is considered as such patent that should be invalid due to the lack of the inventiveness, thus the scope of patent right as itself is not recognized”, the justice department decided as follows: “once a patent is regis
댓글 1개
자세한 내용 보기

Korean Patent and Trademark Applications Increased in 2012 despite Economic Crisis

- Application for patents and trademarks increased by 8% and 7%, respectively - Despite uncertain global economic conditions and financial crises throughout last year, Korean applications for intellectual property rights (IPRs) such as patents and trademarks increased last year, according to recent preliminary statistics. The Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO, Commissioner Ho-won Kim) gathered preliminary statistics on IPR applications from 2012 and found that the total number of applications for patents, trademarks, and industrial designs filed in 2012 increased by about 8% to 400,815 from 371,116 in 2011. Although the uncertainty of the global economy is growing, companies remain committed to dominating new technologies and brands through future-oriented R&D investment, leading to an increase in Korean patent and trademark applications over the past year. By type, applications for patents increased year-on-year by 7.6% to 192,575, utility models by 5.2% to 12,467,
댓글 쓰기
자세한 내용 보기

3. Disputable Agenda on Precedent Case

Claim 5 To form a metal panel in which a filing member is to be filled between a front plate and a rear plate which are made of a colored steel sheet, a method of forming a continuous metal panel comprising: continuously forming said front plate and rear plate having a certain width, in a lengthwise direction; forming caulking grooves having a narrow width to be in equal intervals in a lengthwise direction to said front plate; forming a connection groove portion and a connection projection portion respectively by bending upper and bottom portions of said front and rear plates; installing a cover so that said caulking grooves may be sealed with an outside; stiffening in a manner to fill a filing member between said front and rear plates; and loading said panel by cutting into a necessary length for use Claim 6 The continuous metal panel as claimed in claim 5, produced by use of an insulator in which a filing member is selected from a polyurethane foam (PU), a glass wool bo
댓글 쓰기
자세한 내용 보기